(fig 1, original poster)
King Kong (1933) is a story about destruction and
a creature dragged from its original habitat to the urban jungle of New York.
The film follows an adventurous film-making crew that travels to a distant and
unknown island. Created by Merian
C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack.
There is a sense of naiveté while watching this
classical film. From the captain that receives the map for their destination,
while on the ship, to the beautiful actress that starts a journey, not exactly
knowing what is her part in it, and many more, but there is also a sense of
depth to the movie, and the viewer is somehow engaged with the plot.
(fig. 2 still form the film) (Giantmonstersamongus.blogspot.co.uk,
2013)
Figure 2 is probably one of the most famous
images in cinema, doesn’t matter of the viewers’ age, everyone can recognise
the giant ape on top of the empire state building.
R. Ebert states: “But "King Kong" is more than a technical
achievement. It is also a curiously touching fable in which the beast is seen,
not as a monster of destruction, but as a creature that in its own way wants to
do the right thing.” (Ebert, 2002).
The technical complexity of the film is also noted by the
New York Times: “Through multiple
exposures, processed "shots" and a variety of angles of camera
wizardry the producers set forth an adequate story and furnish enough thrills
for any devotee of such tales.” (Nytimes.com, 2014)
The stop-motion animation still looks really good
and the many layers of almost every shot in the film give a great sense of
depth and a need to explore this uncharted territory.
(fig. 3) (Giantmonstersamongus.blogspot.co.uk,
2013)
In figure 3 is demonstrated the hard work of
designers and film producers. Created in three layers of a painting at the
background, a model in the midground and a real scene as the foreground, an
incredible and fantastical space was created, truly believable and encouraging
the viewer to believe in what they see.
In conclusion, filmsite.org states that the film
is “The greatest and most famous classic
adventure-fantasy (and part-horror) film of all time” (Filmsite.org, 2014) with which every viewer can
agree. The level of detail in every shot is overwhelming and inspiring, even
now, decades later.
Images:
Fig. 1 - Filmsite.org, (2014). King Kong
(1933). [online] Available at: http://www.filmsite.org/kingk.html [Accessed
9 Oct. 2014].
Fig. 2 - Giantmonstersamongus.blogspot.co.uk, (2013). Giant
Monsters Among Us: King Kong 1933. [online] Available at:
http://giantmonstersamongus.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/king-kong-1933_29.html
[Accessed 9 Oct. 2014].
Fig. 3 - Giantmonstersamongus.blogspot.co.uk, (2013). Giant
Monsters Among Us: King Kong 1933. [online] Available at:
http://giantmonstersamongus.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/king-kong-1933_29.html
[Accessed 9 Oct. 2014].
Bibliography:
Ebert, R. (2002). King Kong Movie Review & Film
Summary (1933) | Roger Ebert. [online] Rogerebert.com. Available at:
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-king-kong-1933 [Accessed 9 Oct.
2014].
Nytimes.com, (2014). Movie Review - King Kong - A
Fantastic Film in Which a Monstrous Ape Uses Automobiles for Missiles and
Climbs a Skyscraper. - NYTimes.com. [online] Available at:
http://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9F03E3DC173BEF3ABC4B53DFB5668388629EDE
[Accessed 9 Oct. 2014].
Filmsite.org, (2014). King Kong (1933). [online]
Available at: http://www.filmsite.org/kingk.html [Accessed 9 Oct. 2014].
Hi Vlad!
ReplyDeleteSomething seems to have happened with some of your font....it is black on black!
You have touched on some pertinent points here...maybe you could have had a bit of a discussion around the differences in expectation in the audience then and now; the racial imagery perhaps, or the portrayal of the woman as a screamer?
Hm, I'll try and fix the funny font, i think it's because i use wordpad and the formatting goes mental when i paste it on the blog..
ReplyDeleteGood ppint about the further discussion, i thought the film includes a lot of archetypes that seem offensive today.
Point taken, thank you for your feedback :)
Hey, I think your font problem is just where you have copied and pasted stuff into your post which counteracts the auto settings of your blog, so to correct it you just have to select those bits or all of the text and change it to white (although you won't be able to see it yourself at that moment it should correct it fine when it's published
ReplyDeleteThank you Nat, seems fine now :)
ReplyDelete